The rapid characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has allowed researchers at the Soft Matter Theory Group to learn more about how it interacts with surfaces through extremely precise simulations. The results have been published in the scientific journal Biointephases.
Nov 27, 2020
Image: Electron microscopy image of a typical SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus particle, freely distributed by the NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories (NIAID-RML),1 colored to emphasize the virus structure.
Their research modeled the contact of the spike with cellulose and graphite. These two materials are chosen because of their hydrophilic or hydrophobic nature, which has been shown to be an important factor when studying virus-surface interactions, and because both are used in adsorbents and filters. Cellulose is an amphiphilic material, meaning that because of its molecular structure it is both hydrophilic and lipophilic. Both interactions are essential in the process. Graphite has a strongly lipophilic surface and is hydrophobic, which makes it unable to pursue hydrogen bonds and prone to hydrophobic interactions.
Their model shows two different phases of the contact. On an initial stage, both materials show a similar adsorption, both involving three receptor-binding domains (RBDs) and two N-terminal domains (NTDs). After the first few nanoseconds, the two interactions take different routes. The adsorption on cellulose stabilizes through a large number of hydrogen bonds between the materials and the spike’s RBDs. This phenomenon does not occur on the adsorption onto graphite. As a result of the lack of stabilization between the surface and the proteins in the spike, a large number of residues appear and there is a substantial deformation of the spike, as you can see in this video of the simulation:
Figure: Representative snapshots of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein during the final adsorption stage onto cellulose (left) and graphite (right) surfaces. In graphite, the spike experiences a deformation, while in cellulose it does not. (Credit: Jordi Faraudo and David Malaspina, ICMAB)
This information could be useful in the design of virucides against COVID-19, with carbon materials presenting a helpful strain on the virus’ spikes, which are what allows it to adhere to surfaces. Understanding how the virus interacts with surfaces helps stop its transition.
The researchers consider this a first step in understanding SARS-CoV-2 molecular interactions, requiring of further research. This study is not exactly the Soft Matter Theory Group’s usual line of work:
“I was not really aware before this pandemic that from the field of material sciences you could contribute to slowing the spread of pandemics,” said Jordi Faraudo in an article for AIP Scilight. “But we have experience modeling the interactions of protein with nanoparticles, which isn’t that different than how the most external thing on the virus – a protein – interacts with materials.”
The article offers possible ways to expand on this research, like using models that consider the virus as a whole, or further research into other carbon based surfaces. Researchers are already planning on continuing their investigation on other materials, like some metals like silver, which has antibacterial properties and could help find an antiviral material to stop a virus transmission.
Watch Jordi Faraudo on the European Researchers' Night
Jordi Faraudo explained this research in this short video for the European Researcher's Night (Nit Europea de la Recerca, in Catalan):, celebrated on 27 November 2020 in multiple cities in Europe:
Cover Image: Electron microscopy image of a typical SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus particle, freely distributed by the NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories (NIAID-RML),1 colored to emphasize the virus structure.
Collaboration is a key part of research. Whether it be collaboration with similar researchers with different skill sets or perspectives, or collaboration with researchers in others fields for an interdisciplinary approach, joining efforts with other institutions is a solid way to improve ICMAB’s work. Here are the institutions that have collaborated more with ICMAB in 2020:
International research partnerships are a key factor to improve our collective knowledge. Not only does it allow everybody to share access to different scientific installations and techniques, it also gives research a more diverse viewpoint that ensures every possibility is considered. These are the countries that ICMAB has collaborated more with during 2020:
Scientific dissemination is clearly dependent on journals to help spread the word about research done all around the world. Many specialized journals, in fields like materials science or nanotechnology, have helped ICMAB Researchers get eyes on their research. These are the journals that have shared more of our research in 2020:
The Clarivate journal Impact Factor metric system gives a yearly numeric indicator of how much has an article been cited and how much impact has it had. This year, ICMAB’s average IF has been at 7.42, with an 18 % of all publications having an IF higher than 10. These are the ICMAB articles that have had a higher IF during 2020:
Citation is one of the key factors to understand the effect an article has had on a particular field. This year, ICMAB Researchers have published articles across many fields, like energy storage, thermoelectrics, or nanomedicine. From all this research, two of ICMAB’s articles have become highly cited pieces. Do you want to know which articles have been the most cited this year?